SHRINKAGE AND CREEP EFFECTS ON BRIDGE DESIGN

SHRINKAGE AND CREEP EFFECTS ON BRIDGE DESIGN

 

SHRINKAGE:

Shrinkage cracks in concrete occur when excess water evaporates out of the hardened concrete, reducing the volume of the concrete.

CREEP:

Deformation of structure under sustained load. It’s a time dependent phenomenon. This deformation usually occurs in the direction the force is being applied. Like a concrete column getting more compressed, or a beam bending.
Creep does not necessarily cause concrete to fail or break apart. Creep is factored in when concrete structures are designed.

SHRINKAGE EFFECTS:

  • The shrinkage of the prestressed beam is different from the shrinkage of the deck slab.
  • This is due to the difference in age beam and slab therefore the differential shrinkage induce stresses in prestress composite beams.
  • Larger shrinkage of deck causes composite beams to sag.

DIFFERENTIAL SHRINKAGE :

  • Differential shrinkage between Slab and PS Beams creates internal stresses. It is assumed that half the total shrinkage of the beam has taken before the slab is cast.
  • The effect of differential shrinkage will be reduce by creep. Allowance is made for this in the calculation by using creep coefficient φ.
  • Φ (creep coefficient)= 0.43. Refer BS 8110 Clause 7.4.3.4
  • DIFFERENTIAL SHRINKAGE STRAIN:

έDS= 0.5 x (-300×10-6)

Refer BS 8110 Clause 7.4.3.4 Table 29

  • RESTRAINING FORCE:

 

RF = έDS x Ec x A(slab) x φ

  • RESTRAINING MOMENT:

RM = RF x eccentricity

Eccentricity = y top of composite section – half of slab thicknes

  • CALCULATION OF INTERNAL STRESSES

Restrained Stress (RS) = έDS x Ec x Ф

Axial Release (AR) = RF / X-sec area

Moment Release (MR) = RM x y / inertia

(for top and bottom stresses)

  • NET STRESSES:
  • TOP STRESSES:

Σ(RS , AR , MR)

  • BOTTOM STRESSES:

Σ(MR , AR)

CREEP EFFECTS:

  • We know creep are deformation under the sustained load as in case of prestressed beams prestressing load is applied at the bottom cause the deformation in upward direction and due to creep effect as time passes through long term deflections in upward direction is increases.
  • For camber calculation longterm deflection factors

Dead = 2.0, SDL = 2.3, Prestressing = 2.2

  • This increase in upward direction of simple span beam is not accompanied by stress in beam since there is no rotational restraint of the beam ends.
  • When simple span beam are made continuous through connection at intermediate support, the rotation at the end of the beam tend the creep to induce the stresses.

Bridge Expansion Joints Presentation

Bridge Expansion Joints Presentation

 

Why do we need joints?

  • Bridge deck joints allow a bridge to expand and contract due to a number of factors such as: temperature changes, deflections caused by live loads, creep and shrinkage of concrete etc.
  • Bridge deck joints are a necessary component of a properly designed and functioning structure.

Content:

  • FACTORS EFFECTING THE SELECTION OF DECK JOINT
  • SELECTION OF DECK JOINT TYPE
  • RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SELECTION OF DECK JOINT TYPE

Download Link

Bridge Live Load Distribution Powerpoint Presentation

Bridge Live Load Distribution Powerpoint Presentation

 

Live load distribution on highway bridges is a key response quantity in determining member size and, consequently, strength and serviceability. It is of critical importance both in the design of new bridges and in the evaluation of the load carrying capacity of existing bridges.

Live load distribution is a function of the magnitude and location of truck live loads and the response of the bridge to these loads.

 

Download Link

New Genoa bridge expected to be completed by April 2020

New Genoa bridge expected to be completed by April 2020

 

 

REGGIO EMILIA, Italy  – Rebuilding work on a bridge that collapsed in the Italian city of Genoa last year killing 43 people is expected to be completed by next April despite demolition works running late, the special commissioner for the reconstruction said on Wednesday.

The demolition of the Morandi bridge, which gave way last August sending dozens of vehicles into free-fall, began in February. Italy’s populist government has made its reconstruction a priority, promising a new bridge would be inaugurated next year.

Commissioner Marco Bucci, who is also Genoa’s mayor, said demolition works were running late by two to three weeks, but reconstruction had already begun.

“We’re racing ahead (…) and we’re still proceeding according to plan, which is to have the new bridge ready by April 2020,” he said.

Renowned Genoa-born architect Renzo Piano, who designed the Pompidou Centre in Paris and The Shard skyscraper in London, donated a proposal for the new viaduct and has agreed to supervise the works.

The reconstruction contract has been awarded to Italy’s biggest builder Salini Impregilo and shipbuilder Fincantieri.

The collapse of the bridge has made access to the busy port in the northwestern city more difficult and also meant a lengthy detour for drivers wanting to head onwards to southern France.

 

Source : www.reuters.com

error: Content is protected !!
Exit mobile version